Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 25 January 2019,
European Commission, represented by É. Gippini Fournier and P. Němečková, acting as Agents,
represented by J. Derenne and D. Vallindas, lawyers, and C. Ziegler, Rechtsanwalt,
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Z. Lavery, acting as Agent, and by G. Facenna QC and D. Mackersie, Barrister,
By its appeal, the European Commission seeks to have set aside the judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018, Tempus Energy and Tempus Energy Technology v Commission (T‑793/14, EU:T:2018:790 ), by which that court annulled Commission Decision C(2014) 5083 final of 23 July 2014 not to raise objections to the aid scheme for the capacity market in the United Kingdom, on the ground that that scheme is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) TFEU (State aid 2014/N-2) (OJ 2014 C 348, p. 5, ‘the contested decision’).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.