Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 8 • Expulsion • Respect for private life • Expulsion order with a re-entry ban of six years • Existence of very serious reasons for expelling settled migrant who had spent whole life in the host country and despite being sentenced only to three months� imprisonment, in light notably of nature of offence and long history of serious and violent criminality • No minimum requirement as to sentence or seriousness of crime resulting in expulsion • Proportionality duly assessed by Supreme Court in light of Court�s case-law
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Marko Bo�njak, President, ��������� Jon Fridrik Kj�lbro, ��������� Ale� Pejchal, ��������� Egidijus Kūris, ��������� Branko Lubarda, ��������� Pauliine Koskelo, ��������� Saadet Y�ksel, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 26957/19 ) against the Kingdom of Denmark lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Pakistani national, Mr Shuaib Khan (�the applicant�), on 15 May 2019;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.