Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Art 3 (substantive and procedural) • Inhuman and degrading treatment • Prison authorities� unreasonable delay in screening prisoner for hepatitis C • Failure to investigate applicant�s complaints concerning infection while in prison • Failure to take effective measures aimed at preventing transmission of contagious diseases in prison • Inadequate medical supervision and treatment in prison
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 � 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
��������� Arnfinn B�rdsen , President , ��������� Jovan Ilievski, ��������� Egidijus Kūris, ��������� Saadet Y�ksel, ��������� Lorraine Schembri Orland, ��������� Diana S�rcu, ��������� Davor Derenčinović , judges , and Hasan Bakırcı, Section Registrar,
the application (no. 69086/14) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) by a Moldovan national, Ms Tatiana Machina (�the applicant�), on 23 October 2014;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.