Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Fight against terrorism - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities - Freezing of funds - Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 - Continued inclusion of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts - Statement of individual reasons notified to the organisation set out in a separate document from that containing a general statement of reasons - Authentication of the statement of individual reasons - Article 297(2) TFEU)
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 14 November 2019,
Council of the European Union, represented by B. Driessen and S. Van Overmeire, acting as Agents,
composed of K. Lenaerts, President, A. Prechal, E. Regan, S. Rodin and I. Jarukaitis, Presidents of Chambers, T. von Danwitz (Rapporteur), M. Safjan, F. Biltgen, P.G. Xuereb, N. Piçarra and L.S. Rossi, Judges,
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 3 June 2021,
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.