Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
��������� Georgios A. Serghides , President , ��������� Jolien Schukking, ��������� Darian Pavli , judges , and Olga Chernishova, Deputy Section Registrar,
the application (no. 55496/19) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (�the Convention�) on 11 October 2019 by a Russian limited liability company, OOO Mediafokus (�the applicant company�), that was represented by Ms S. Kuzevanova, a lawyer practising in Voronezh;
the decision to give notice of the application to the Russian Government (�the Government�), initially represented by Mr M. Galperin, former Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and later by his successor in this office, Mr M. Vinogradov;
1.  The case concerns the wholesale blocking of access to a new website of an online media on the grounds that its content �mirrored� the proscribed content on its former website.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Put your case reading into practice. The free readiness diagnostic covers SQE1 subjects and highlights where to revise next. No account needed.
Try the free SQE1 diagnosticMultiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.