Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Paul Lemmens, President, Valeriu Griţco, Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,
The case originated in an application (no. 39047/11 ) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by a Turkish national, Mr Ahmet Kınık ("the applicant"), on 22 April 2011.
The applicant was represented by Mrs M. Danış Beştaş and Mr M. Beştaş, lawyers practising in Diyarbakır. The Turkish Government ("the Government") were represented by their Agent.
The applicant complained under Articles 1, 10 and 11 of the Convention that the criminal proceedings brought against him under section 7 (2) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law No. 3713) had constituted a breach of his rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
[2023] ECHR 69
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.