What is the ratio in Dick Bentley v Harold Smith Motors?

A statement of fact can constitute a contractual term rather than mere representation if the parties intended it to be binding, assessed objectively from their conduct and circumstances.

What did the court decide in Dick Bentley v Harold Smith Motors?

The Court of Appeal held that the dealer's statement about mileage was a contractual term, not just a representation, making the dealer liable for breach of contract.

Why is Dick Bentley v Harold Smith Motors important for contract law?

It established the key factors courts use to distinguish between binding contractual terms and non-binding representations, including parties' expertise, timing, and ability to verify statements.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library