What is the ratio in CTN Cash and Carry v Gallaher?

Lawful threats, particularly in ongoing commercial relationships, cannot generally constitute economic duress even if they create substantial commercial pressure on the other party.

What did the court decide in CTN Cash and Carry v Gallaher?

The Court of Appeal held that threatening to withdraw lawful credit facilities did not constitute economic duress, despite the commercial pressure this created.

Why is CTN Cash and Carry v Gallaher important for economic duress?

It establishes important limits on duress doctrine, showing that lawful commercial pressure cannot ground duress claims and preserving space for legitimate hard bargaining.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library