What is the ratio in National Westminster Bank v Morgan?

For presumed undue influence, there must be a relationship of trust and confidence, a transaction calling for explanation, and manifest disadvantage to the complainant.

What did the court decide in National Westminster Bank v Morgan?

The House of Lords held that no undue influence existed as there was insufficient relationship of trust and confidence and no manifest disadvantage.

Why is National Westminster Bank v Morgan important for undue influence?

It refined the test for presumed undue influence by adding the manifest disadvantage requirement and provided the modern analytical framework.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library