What is the ratio in Raffles v Wichelhaus?

The ratio is that a contract is void where there is mutual mistake about a fundamental term arising from genuine ambiguity, as there can be no meeting of minds (consensus ad idem).

What did the court decide in Raffles v Wichelhaus?

The court decided that no valid contract existed because both parties were mistaken about which ship 'Peerless' was intended, preventing any true agreement between them.

Why is Raffles v Wichelhaus important for contract law?

It demonstrates the requirement for consensus ad idem in contract formation and shows how mutual mistake about fundamental terms can void a contract entirely.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library