What is the ratio in Tsakiroglou v Noblee Thorl?

Frustration occurs only when performance becomes radically different from what was originally contemplated. Mere inconvenience, delay, or additional expense is insufficient to frustrate a contract.

What did the court decide in Tsakiroglou v Noblee Thorl?

The House of Lords held that closure of the Suez Canal did not frustrate the contract as an alternative route remained available, despite being longer and more expensive.

Why is Tsakiroglou v Noblee Thorl important for contract law?

It established strict limits on the frustration doctrine, providing crucial guidance on distinguishing between mere commercial hardship and true frustration of contractual purpose.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library