What is the ratio in Royscot Trust v Rogerson?

Damages under s2(1) Misrepresentation Act 1967 are assessed on the same basis as fraudulent misrepresentation, allowing recovery of all consequential losses flowing from the misrepresentation.

What did the court decide in Royscot Trust v Rogerson?

The Court of Appeal held that Royscot could recover the full outstanding hire purchase balance as consequential damages under s2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967.

Why is Royscot Trust v Rogerson important for contract law?

It establishes that s2(1) damages can be more generous than contractual damages, potentially making misrepresentation claims more attractive than breach of contract claims.

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library

Premium Case

This case is available to Pro and Elite subscribers. Upgrade to access the full library of 500+ landmark cases.

Upgrade to Pro

← Back to Case Library